LLM Digest
Subscribe

AI Storyline

3 items · 3 sources · 3 days

View as JSON

Operational story trace

Action Reasoning

Latest change

A new arXiv paper formalizes the harness between an LLM and its tools as a Petri-net supervisory controller to block unsafe tool calls under prompt injection.

Earlier contextThe story so far

Three arXiv papers in three days examine the gap between LLM reasoning and acting. One proposes a benchmark for action and plan safety in embodied agents, and another tests frontier models on robot manipulation.

editor-curated · source-linked

Arc

Oct 20Oct 22 · now
BENCHMARK · Oct 20
CAPSafe benchmarks safety reasoning for embodied agents
1 source · show source ▾
EVALUATION · Oct 21
Frontier models tested on LIBERO-10 robot manipulation
1 source · show source ▾
NOW · Oct 22
Petri-net supervisory control between reasoning and action
1 source · show source ▾

What to watch — open questions

  • Do any of the three papers report results on a deployed agent framework rather than a benchmark or formal model?
  • Does the Petri-net harness release code or measured overhead for tool-call latency?
How this thread was built
editor wrote the arc · 3 beats

Storylines are threaded mechanically from the feed: stories that share a distinctive anchor across multiple days and sources. Each item links to its original source. The evidence trace, current state, and open questions are written by the editor routine and refreshed whenever a new beat lands.